Isn’t this what UFO was designed for? Perhaps the script also imports data that UFO doesn’t support? Thanks. In fact, FOG 5 is even able to read and export FontLab VFB files, so exchanging documents between different font editors is easy Looks smooth, rocks hard While. Every method seems to have a problem of some sort. Font Remix Tools 1.63 for FontLab Studio 5. I’ve done a number of tests and data seems to easily get corrupted or lost when passing files between apps and formats. This RMX licence is only valid for FontLab, we do not offer bundles for Glyphs & FontLab or cross-editor upgrades. Has anything improved with FontLab VI or is it still better to use the script? I read a post on the Glyphs blog that suggests that FontLab UFO export isn’t as good as the Glyphs Export script, as it loses too much info. From there I can use FontLab’s UFO export or schriftgestalt Glyphs Export.py ( ) to get the file into Glyphs. What’s the best practice for this in 2019? I have a demo of FontLab VI and also a full version of FontLab 5 so I can import the FOG file into either, but I’m unsure which will give better results. After doing some tests it turns out that FontLab’s FOG import is much better than Fontographer 5’s VFB export, as the header data gets mangled along the way. Much of the difficulty in type design is getting comfortable with the software used to make fonts. I understand that the only way to do this is via FontLab. FontLab Studio 5 is an exceptional application for font de. I’ve got some old FOG files that I want to convert, mainly for archiving.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |